In dark and early ages, through the primal forests faring, Ere the soul came shining into prehistoric night, Twofold man was equal; they were comrades dear and daring, Living wild and free together in unreasoning delight. Ere the soul was born and consciousness came slowly, Ere the soul was born, to man and woman, too, Ere he found the Tree of Knowledge, that awful tree and holy, Ere he knew he felt, and knew he knew.
Then said he to Pain, "I am wise now, and I know you! No more will I suffer while power and wisdom last!
And woman? Ah, the woman! His now,—he knew it! He was strong to madness In that early dawning after prehistoric night. His,—his forever!
That glory sweet and tender! Ah, but he would love her! And she should love but him! He would work and struggle for her, he would shelter and defend her,— She should never leave him, never, till their eyes in death were dim. Close, close he bound her, that she should leave him never; Weak still he kept her, lest she be strong to flee; And the fainting flame of passion he kept alive forever With all the arts and forces of earth and sky and sea.
And, ah, the long journey! The slow and awful ages They have labored up together, blind and crippled, all astray! Through what a mighty volume, with a million shameful s, From the freedom of the forests to the prisons of to-day! Food he ate for pleasure, and it slew him with diseases!
Wine he drank for gladness, and it led the way to crime! He will hold her,—he will have her when he pleases— And he never once hath seen her since the prehistoric time! Gone the friend and comrade of the day when life was younger, She who rests and comforts, she who helps and saves. Still he seeks her vainly, with a never-dying hunger; Alone beneath his tyrants, alone above his slaves! Toiler, bent and weary with the load of thine own making!
Thou who art sad and lonely, though lonely all in vain! Who hast sought to conquer Pleasure and have her for the taking, And found that Pleasure only was another name for Pain— Nature hath reclaimed thee, forgiving dispossession!
Maassachusetts God hath not forgotten, though man doth still forget! The woman-soul is rising, in despite of thy transgression— Loose her now, and trust her! She will love thee yet! Love thee?
She will love thee as only freedom knoweth! She will love thee while Love itself doth live! Fear not the heart of woman! No bitterness it showeth! The ages of her sorrow have but taught her to forgive! It is hoped also that the theory advanced will prove sufficiently suggestive to give rise to such further study and discussion as shall prove its error or establish its truth.
Charlotte Perkins Stetson I. SINCE we have learned to study the development of human life as we study the evolution of species throughout the animal kingdom, some peculiar phenomena which have puzzled the philosopher and moralist for so long, begin to show themselves in a new light.
We begin to see that, so far from being inscrutable problems, requiring another life to explain, these sorrows and perplexities of our lives are but the natural of natural causes, and that, as soon as we ascertain the causes, we can do much to remove them. In spite of the power of the individual will to struggle against conditions, to resist them for a while, and Excrss to overcome them, it remains true that the human creature is affected by his environment, as is every other living thing.
The power of the individual will to resist natural law is well proven by the life and death of the Excess Boston Massachusetts perfect sex. In any one of those suicidal martyrs may be seen the will, misdirected by the ill-informed intelligence, forcing the perfext to defy every natural impulse,—even to the door of death, and through it. But, while these exceptions show what the human will can do, the general course of life shows the inexorable effect of conditions upon humanity.
Of these conditions we perfecy with other living things the environment of the material universe. We are affected by climate and locality, by physical, chemical, electrical forces, as are all animals and plants. With the animals, we farther share the effect of eprfect own activity, the reactionary force of exercise. What Massachusdtts do, as well as what is done to us, makes us what we are. But, beyond these forces, we Masssachusetts under the effect of a third set of conditions peculiar to our human status; namely, social conditions.
In the organic interchanges which constitute social life, we are affected by each other to a degree beyond what is found even among the most gregarious of animals. This third factor, the social environment, is of enormous force as a modifier of human life.
Throughout all these environing conditions, those which affect us through our economic necessities are most marked in their influence. Without touching yet upon the influence of the social factors, treating the human being merely as an individual animal, we see that he is modified most by his economic conditions, as is Massachjsetts other animal.
Differ as they may in color and size, in strength and speed, in minor adaptation to minor conditions, all animals that live on grass have distinctive traits in common, and all animals that eat flesh have distinctive traits in common,—so distinctive and so common that it is by teeth, by Bostoj apparatus in general, that they are classified, rather than by means of defence or locomotion. The food supply of the animal is the largest passive factor in his development; the processes by which he obtains his food supply, the largest active factor in his development.
It is these activities, the incessant repetition of the exertions by which he is fed, which most modify his structure and develope his functions. The sheep, the cow, the deer, differ in their adaptation to the weather, their locomotive ability, their means of defence; but they agree in main characteristics, because of their common method of nutrition. The human animal is no exception to this rule. Climate affects him, weather affects him, enemies affect him; but Bostkn of all he is affected, like every other living creature, by what he does for his living.
Under all the influence of his later and wider life, all the reactive effect of social institutions, the individual is still inexorably modified by his means of livelihood: "the hand of the dyer is subdued to what he works in. Here is a people rising to national prominence, first as a pastoral, and then as an agricultural nation; only partially commercial through race affinity with the Phoenicians, the pioneer traders of the world. Under the social power of a united Christendom—united at least in this most unchristian deed—the Jew was forced to get his livelihood by commercial methods solely.
Many effects can be traced in him to the fierce pressure of the social conditions to which he was subjected: the intense family devotion of a people who had no country, no Masaachusetts, no room for joy and pride except the family; the reduced size and Bozton vitality and endurance of the pitilessly selected survivors of the Ghetto; the repeated bursts of erratic genius from the human spirit so inhumanly restrained.
But more patent still is the effect of the economic conditions,—the artificial development of a race of traders and dealers in Excesa, from the lowest pawnbroker to the house of Rothschild; a special kind of people, bred of the economic environment in which they were compelled to live. One rough but familiar instance of the same effect, from the same cause, we can all see in the marked distinction between the pastoral, the agricultural, and the manufacturing classes in any nation, though their other conditions be the same.
On the clear line of argument that functions and organs are developed by use, Excess Boston Massachusetts perfect sex what we use most is developed most, and that the daily processes of supplying economic needs are the processes that we most use, it follows that, when we find special economic conditions affecting any special class of people, we may look for specialand find them. In view of these facts, attention is now called to a certain marked and peculiar economic condition affecting the human race, and unparalleled in the organic world.
We are the only animal species in which the female depends on the male for food, the only animal species in which the sex-relation Masszchusetts also an economic relation. With us an entire sex lives in a relation of economic dependence upon the other sex, and the economic relation is combined with the sex-relation. The economic status of the human female is relative to the sex-relation. It is commonly assumed that this condition also obtains among other animals, but such is not the case.
There are many birds among which, during the nesting season, the male helps the female feed the young, and partially feeds her; and, with certain of the higher carnivora, the male helps the female feed the young, and partially feeds her. In no case does she depend on him absolutely, even during this season, save in that of the hornbill, where the female, sitting on her nest in a hollow tree, is walled in with clay by the male, so that only her beak projects; and then he feeds her while the eggs are developing.
But even the female hornbill does not expect to be fed at any other time. The female bee and ant are economically dependent, but not on the male. The workers are females, too, specialized to economic functions solely.
And with the carnivora, if the young are to lose one parent, it might far better be the father: the mother is quite competent to take care of them herself. With many species, as in the case of the common cat, she not only feeds herself and her young, but has to defend the young against the male as well. In no case is the Mzssachusetts throughout her life supported by the male.
In the human species the condition is permanent and general, though there are exceptions, and though the present century is witnessing the beginnings of a great change in this respect. We have not been Massachusetfs to face this fact beyond our loose generalization that it was "natural," and that other animals did so, too. To many this view will not seem clear at first; and the case of working peasant women or females of savage tribes, and the general household industry of women, will be instanced against it.
Some careful and honest discrimination is needed to make plain to ourselves the essential facts of the relation, even in these cases. The horse, in his free natural condition, is economically independent. He gets his living by his own exertions, irrespective of any other creature. The horse, in his present condition of slavery, is economically dependent.
He gets his living at the hands of his master; and his exertions, though strenuous, bear no direct relation to his living. In fact, the horses who are the best fed Massachusetys cared Exfess and the horses who are the hardest worked are quite different animals. The horse works, it is true; but what he gets to eat Maassachusetts on the power and will of his master.
His living comes through another. He is economically dependent. So with the hard-worked savage or peasant women. Their labor is the property of another: they work under another will; and what they receive depends not on their labor, but on the power and will of another. They are economically dependent. This is true of the human female both individually and collectively. In studying the economic position of the sexes collectively, the difference is most marked. As a social animal, the economic status of man rests on the combined and exchanged services of vast s of progressively specialized individuals.
The economic progress of the race, its maintenance at any period, its continued advance, involve the collective activities of all the trades, crafts, arts, manufactures, inventions, discoveries, Massachuzetts all the civil and military institutions that go to maintain them.
The economic status of any race at any time, with its involved effect on all the constituent individuals, depends on their world-wide labors and their free exchange. Economic progress, however, is almost exclusively masculine. Such economic processes as women have been allowed to exercise are of the earliest and most primitive kind.